Lou Reed and the Wild Side of Estate Planning


Recent filings with the Surrogate’s Court in Manhattan (that’s probate court, for us non-New Yorkers) show that Lou Reed’s estate has already earned $20,379,169 (give or take a few bucks) since he passed away from liver disease on October 27, 2013, at the age of 71.  This is only the income that the estate has brought in since his death, from his copyright, publishing and performance royalties and other deals put together under the skillful management of his longtime manager and friend, Robert Gotterer.

We have heard this song before, and it can be hard to listen to.

The vanguard artist who sang “Take a walk on the wild side,” did just that when it came to his estate plan. With an estate worth more than $30 million, Lou Reed could have spent a little less time walkin’ and more time with his estate planning attorney.

The recent Forbes article, titled Lou Reed Walked On The Wild Side With His Estate Planning,” reports that the singer left assets of approximately $10 million for his wife and sister, along with $500,000 left to his sister to use in her discretion for their 93-year old mother’s care. Experimental performance artist Laurie Anderson, who was Reed’s wife, will receive 75% of the residual of his estate. Reed’s sister will get the remaining 25%. This could be more than $9 million worth of real estate in New York passing to Anderson alone.

Sounds pretty straightforward, doesn’t it?

According to Forbes, in April 2012, Lou signed a 34-page will. That is the extent of his estate planning … no trusts or other asset protection devices.

Reports are that Reed was fully aware of the fact that he was suffering from liver disease, as he signed the will 18 months before he passed. The articlesuggests that he should have updated his plan to include a revocable living trust, which would have allowed his family to keep this matter private, rather than having all of the financial details revealed in probate court and thereafter in the press. With a revocable living trust, you can move assets into the trust while you are living, and this information will remain private after your passing. Wills are required to be probated in court, a very public process. On the other hand, trusts, when set up by an estate planning attorney and “funded,” will sidestep probate court completely.

Another important aspect of a will versus a trust is that it is much easier to challenge a will in probate court than it is to object to the provisions of a trust which is administered privately. In addition, it is simple to leave detailed instructions, including conditions, limitations, and suggestions, in a comprehensive trust document instead of a will, no matter how long it is!

Trusts can be a benefit to you while you are alive and have the opportunity to determine how your assets are managed if you are no longer able to do so. That is not the case with wills. Do not be a music or estate planning rebel like Lou Reed—contact your estate planning attorney and see if a revocable living trust is a wise choice for your situation.

We invite you to explore our website for additional information about our firm and any particular topics that may be of interest to you.

Reference: Forbes (July 10, 2014) Lou Reed Walked On The Wild Side With His Estate Planning

Subscribe to our newsletter

Act now.

Provide protection for yourself and the people you care for.

Take action before it becomes a race against time.

Rely on the Barbara M. Pizzolato, P.A. skilled estate team to shield your work and guide your loved ones.

We specialize in estate planning, incapacity planning, business planning, trust administration, and probate.

Take your first step by contacting us or attending a free estate planning event today.

Time waits for no one.

Skip to content